Problem in Instead of Delete Trigger

Hi,
I have Instead of Delete Trigger in my Table. When i delete any row
from the table it shows the No of Rows affected ex:- 1 Row affected
But when i look into the table the Deleted Row is still Present.
My Question is If there is Instead of Delete Trigger then is it not
possible to delete row from Original table. and if i want to delete the
row using Instead of trigger what i have to do?
If anybody knows the solution Please let me know?
Thanks,
VinothIt really depends on what are you doing in the instead of delete trigger. Do
you actually delete the row in the trigger? Please post sample code from the
trigger if you need more help (desired result and sample data/table would be
helpful...)
MC
<vinoth@.gsdindia.com> wrote in message
news:1132308519.761801.276040@.g49g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
> Hi,
> I have Instead of Delete Trigger in my Table. When i delete any row
> from the table it shows the No of Rows affected ex:- 1 Row affected
> But when i look into the table the Deleted Row is still Present.
> My Question is If there is Instead of Delete Trigger then is it not
> possible to delete row from Original table. and if i want to delete the
> row using Instead of trigger what i have to do?
> If anybody knows the solution Please let me know?
>
> Thanks,
> Vinoth
>|||Hi,
if I understand you correct you're deleteing a record and your trigger is
firing reporting the number of rows affected ' So far so good. If this
was
a normal "After" trigger the record would be deleted in the table. An
instead of trigger is different. The delete actually take place in the
table. You have to do that by yourself.
So in your trigger code you could do something like this :
Delete from table where id=(Select id from deleted)
But why are you using an instead of trigger and not an after trigger ?
Normally you use instead of triggers when you want to handle the dml
action
yourself for instance in partitioned views.
Regards :)
Bobby Henningsen
"MC" <marko_culo#@.#yahoo#.#com#> wrote in message
news:eHrFsqC7FHA.476@.TK2MSFTNGP15.phx.gbl...
> It really depends on what are you doing in the instead of delete
trigger.
> Do you actually delete the row in the trigger? Please post sample code
> from the trigger if you need more help (desired result and sample
> data/table would be helpful...)
>
> MC
>
> <vinoth@.gsdindia.com> wrote in message
> news:1132308519.761801.276040@.g49g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
>> Hi,
>> I have Instead of Delete Trigger in my Table. When i delete any row
>> from the table it shows the No of Rows affected ex:- 1 Row affected
>> But when i look into the table the Deleted Row is still Present.
>> My Question is If there is Instead of Delete Trigger then is it not
>> possible to delete row from Original table. and if i want to delete the
>> row using Instead of trigger what i have to do?
>> If anybody knows the solution Please let me know?
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Vinoth
>
---
Jeg beskyttes af den gratis SPAMfighter til privatbrugere.
Den har indtil videre sparet mig for at få 711 spam-mails.
Betalende brugere får ikke denne besked i deres e-mails.
Hent gratis SPAMfighter her: www.spamfighter.dksql